| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Otto Yamamoto
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:41 pm Post subject: Re: About John McCain |
 |
|
The dead horse is approaching a subatomic level.
--
Otto Yamamoto |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
US 71
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:40 am Post subject: Re: About John McCain |
|
|
"Otto Yamamoto" <mryamamoto@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4922fe9d$0$4907$607ed4bc@cv.net...
| Quote: | The dead horse is approaching a subatomic level.
--
Otto Yamamoto
|
Sadomasochistic necrophilic beastiality ?  |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Premier Bush
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:53 am Post subject: Re: About John McCain |
|
|
John Mayson wrote:
| Quote: | On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Premier Bush wrote:
During that era, if Clinton supported, say, spaying and neutering
dogs, the Repubs would have opposed it just because it was Clinton
supporting it.
What do you base this on? Right off the top of my head I can name
something both Clinton and the Republicans agreed on: NAFTA. Another
was the Kosovo War. They both opposed same-sex marriage. The list
goes on.
|
And look where NAFTA has gotten us. The one thing the Repubs SHOULD have
opposed they embraced. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Otto Yamamoto
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:05 am Post subject: Re: About John McCain |
|
|
Premier Bush wrote:
| Quote: | John Mayson wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Premier Bush wrote:
During that era, if Clinton supported, say, spaying and neutering
dogs, the Repubs would have opposed it just because it was Clinton
supporting it.
What do you base this on? Right off the top of my head I can name
something both Clinton and the Republicans agreed on: NAFTA. Another
was the Kosovo War. They both opposed same-sex marriage. The list
goes on.
And look where NAFTA has gotten us. The one thing the Repubs SHOULD have
opposed they embraced.
|
The republicans demonise Clinton excessively. He was the best president they
ever had.
--
Otto Yamamoto |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Free Lunch
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:05 am Post subject: Re: About John McCain |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:24:48 -0500, Otto Yamamoto
<mryamamoto@optonline.net> wrote in misc.transport.road:
| Quote: | Premier Bush wrote:
John Mayson wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Premier Bush wrote:
During that era, if Clinton supported, say, spaying and neutering
dogs, the Repubs would have opposed it just because it was Clinton
supporting it.
What do you base this on? Right off the top of my head I can name
something both Clinton and the Republicans agreed on: NAFTA. Another
was the Kosovo War. They both opposed same-sex marriage. The list
goes on.
And look where NAFTA has gotten us. The one thing the Repubs SHOULD have
opposed they embraced.
The republicans demonise Clinton excessively. He was the best president they
ever had.
|
They never forgave FDR for saving capitalism. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Kenny McCormack
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 10:55 am Post subject: Re: About John McCain |
|
|
In article <gfqoio01acn@drn.newsguy.com>,
H.B. Elkins <hbelkins@mis.net.restrictorplate> wrote:
....
| Quote: | Oh, you think I'm an upper class guy, huh? Well you're wrong, dead wrong. I'm
not dumb enough to reveal my income on this newsgroup, but I can tell you with
certainty that it's definitely middle-class, and on the lower end of that.
|
Oopsy daisy! You just walked right into the trap.
The saddest thing in the world is seeing lower class (by which we mean,
people who make less than $5,000,000/yr, per the McCain definition)
people supporting Bush (and the Repubs in general). We see this
happening for various psycho-social reasons, including (but not limited
to) religion (which is, and always will be, the Repubs only playable
card), and the "I want a President who I can have a beer with" idiocy.
But economically, it just makes no sense. Can you say "Building my own
gallows"?
I could understand (and would actually admire) you if you *were* a Wall
Street fat cat and supported Bush and the Repubs. But to be a working
schmoe (like the rest of us) and to do so is, well, how do I put this,
just plain dumb. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
H.B. Elkins
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 8:58 am Post subject: Re: About John McCain |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:55:57 +0000 (UTC), Kenny McCormack wrote:
| Quote: | I could understand (and would actually admire) you if you *were* a Wall
Street fat cat and supported Bush and the Repubs. But to be a working
schmoe (like the rest of us) and to do so is, well, how do I put this,
just plain dumb.
|
You're an idiot. Goodbye. Plonk.
--
To reply by e-mail, remove the "restrictor plate" |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Kenny McCormack
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:11 pm Post subject: Re: About John McCain |
|
|
In article <ggnok10u4d@drn.newsguy.com>,
H.B. Elkins <hbelkins@mis.net.restrictorplate> wrote:
| Quote: | On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 10:55:57 +0000 (UTC), Kenny McCormack wrote:
I could understand (and would actually admire) you if you *were* a Wall
Street fat cat and supported Bush and the Repubs. But to be a working
schmoe (like the rest of us) and to do so is, well, how do I put this,
just plain dumb.
You're an idiot. Goodbye. Plonk.
|
Do the words "ad hominem" hold any meaning for you? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Scott M. Kozel
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:53 am Post subject: Re: About John McCain |
|
|
H.B. Elkins <hbelkins@mis.net.restrictorplate> wrote:
| Quote: |
Kenny McCormack wrote:
I could understand (and would actually admire) you if you *were* a Wall
Street fat cat and supported Bush and the Repubs. But to be a working
schmoe (like the rest of us) and to do so is, well, how do I put this,
just plain dumb.
You're an idiot. Goodbye. Plonk.
|
Kenny is suffering from an RCI --
http://www.emailjoke.com/inversion.html
--
Scott M. Kozel Highway and Transportation History Websites
Virginia/Maryland/Washington, D.C. http://www.roadstothefuture.com
Capital Beltway Projects http://www.capital-beltway.com
Philadelphia and Delaware Valley http://www.pennways.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
